Fall larch hike - Alberta Rockies

This bright green lichen (Letharia sp.) made a stunning contrast with the black larch bark:

... and added another shock of colour to the tapestry of yellow and greens from the bilberry and crowberry on the forest floor:

Still a couple of Sedum lanceolatum in bloom:

Down the valley:

Asters:

A group of three blue grouse (or whatever they are called now?) came out of the woods and wandered across in front of us, poking around for food and chasing grasshoppers... we stood still and watched them, and they got very close:
 

Lichen on the rocks; fall-coloured alpine potentillas and other plants among the rock slabs:
 

Up the valley with dry lakebed, and persistent snowbanks in the distance:

The way up on these hikes tends to involve too much suffering to allow much botany appreciation ( ;)) but we were better able to take in the dense understory of false huckleberry, Menziesia ferruginea on the way down through the lodgepole pines:

And wrapping up this account of an enjoyable hike, here are couple of photos of fungi and lichens...
Edit:  Sarcodon imbricatus(?):
 

Lichen, Edit:  Cladonia deformis(?):

We've had that smoke haze too, seemingly for weeks...
Great to see the Sedum :)
The alpine larches seem broader than our tamaracks, though it could just be younger trees? of course here, they don't often get to grow in a fully open place- at the least they have tall grass and willows, alders, birches around them, until they grow taller and  often they also have spruce and many of their own kind to compete with...

Hoy wrote:

The last fungus, could it be a Sarcodon imbricatus? Which is tasty as young!
The yellow? (you say green) lichen on that larch looks similar to Letharia vulpina (wolf lichen) used by farmers for poisoning wolves in old times.

Yes, you may well be right about both IDs.  Both the species you suggest occur here.  For the lichen, it seems it would be either Letharia vulpina (has soredia) or Letharia columbiana (has large brown apothecia but never soredia); the former is the most common, while the latter is common at higher elevations especially on larch, subalpine fir and whitebark pine... now I have to try to figure out what that distinction means (something about the spore-producing structures, apparently).  ???

Cohan, I haven't seen tamaracks in some time and can't even comment... was hoping we'd see some good black spruce bogs up north but it was much more deciduous upland than I expected.

Trond, I need you to come and give me a primer on fungi and lichens etc! We have tons of non-vascular plants, and I love them and photograph them regularly, but I know little about them, and can id none! What little looking in books I've done only convinced me there are so many similar ones I have no hope of deciding a definite species!

You're ahead of me, Trond  ;D