The NARGS Forum
May 21, 2013, 09:47:22 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The NARGS Forum opens to non-members as well as members starting January 31, 2011.  If you wish to be a contributor, please click on the REGISTER button.


Click here to go to the NARGS Main Website.


Interested in joining Nargs?  Click here to go to the membership page.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages:  1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: too many plants?  (Read 935 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Lori S.
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2690



« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2010, 11:17:28 AM »

All this talk of too many plants brings to mind a discussion I would have liked to hear first hand (assuming I could learn enough German to understand it:)

Frederick the Great: "Really, Amadeus, I rather liked the piece, but feel perhaps, that it has a few too many notes?"

Mozart: "Which ones would you have me take out, your liege?"

Amadeus, one of my all time favorite movies, and a favorite memorable scene about too many notes Grin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCud8H7z7vU

So the question is, does your garden have just as many plants as are required, neither more nor less?  Grin

I love the movie too!  (BTW, "Frederick the Great" = Emperor Joseph II.)

Deferring your question for the moment...  how does one get to this extremely-personal state of gardening nirvana you describe, without having tried essentially every species/cultivar that has a remote chance of survival in one's conditions, which would usually take some decades... in order to know which will ultimately give the highest level of satisfaction throughout the year, and not to have missed out on all the others that might be even more satisfactory?  It would seem that thoroughness, and personal evaluation (rather than just accepting someone else's opinion) would make it difficult to shortcut the process!      
Logged

Lori
Calgary, Alberta, Canada - Zone 3
-30 C to +30 C (rarely!); elevation ~1130m; annual precipitation ~40 cm
McDonough
The Onion Man
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2725


10K Man


WWW
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2010, 11:49:33 PM »


Deferring your question for the moment...  how does one get to this extremely-personal state of gardening nirvana you describe, without having tried essentially every species/cultivar that has a remote chance of survival in one's conditions, which would usually take some decades... in order to know which will ultimately give the highest level of satisfaction throughout the year, and not to have missed out on all the others that might be even more satisfactory?  It would seem that thoroughness, and personal evaluation (rather than just accepting someone else's opinion) would make it difficult to shortcut the process!     

Aha, an interesting philosophical question, and you hit the nail on the head with the question "and not to have missed out on all the others that might be even more satisfactory".  It's that fear of missing out that one must overcome, the realization one is not going to grow every pleasurable plant on this earth, but one can certainly narrow down the list to those that TRULY satisfy.  If you played the "what if" game, and I could only have 100 different plants in my garden, what would they be?  And the number 100 is purely arbitrary... it could be 50, 100, 500, or whatever.

I know I have a problem, when most of my woody plants grown from seed, are still in pots with trunks that equal or exceed the size of the pots they are in!  I know I have a problem, when most of the seedlings that I get from sowing seed die a slow death from neglect due to tardiness finding a spot for them in the garden.  I know I have a problem, when I still have many hundreds of seed packets unsown, such as 2 or more entire distributions of NARGS seed from the mid 2000s... my seed sowing is such an utterly haphazard affair.  I know I have a problem when I grow some ugly tidbit because it was given to me by a friend... they liked it, but I don't, yet I keep it anyway (in all fairness, many of my now favorite plants came from friends, so it goes both ways).  I know I have a problem when I grow plants that are well-known, liked, if not revered, yet I might find a brief floral display okay but the rest of the year I wonder why the hey I grow these plants that look boring if not ugly the rest of the year (Roscoea come to mind).

So, I haven't reached "nirvana" yet, not even close, but I have started to realize that over and over again, I have succumbed to the same plant addictions, and the plants suffer or die, I suffer mental anguish and guilt from plant neglect, and the daily burden that I "must find a spot" for this plant or that is a constant monkey on my back.  It must stop.  I feel that, even with my limited "palette" of plants, if I were never to add an additional new plant genus or species, I have enough plants... still enough diversity with natural diversity of self-sown seedlings and hybridization, and bulking up on the plants I have, for a lifetime of plant and gardening pleasure.

Believe me, I'm not throwing in the towel (or the trowel, as it may be), but I'm leveling out, reaching a rational plateau, refocusing on those plants that truly please me.  Am I missing out if there exists a plant that would please me twice or three times as much as the plants that currently please me, possibly so, but that doesn't matter, as I already have plants that please me immensely.

Acceptance is key; I accept that I'll probably never grow hardy cacti in New England; I admire them greatly, love seeing them featured here on NARGS Forum, but they are not high enough on my "plants that please me 365 days of the year" category to make the jump, and besides, it would break another rule... no plants with spines in my garden (I HATE being poked), in fact, this year I finally dug up and threw away a very dwarf sprawling white Rosa cultivar that Harry Dewey gave me, just tired of getting stabbed by the thorns, so out it went.  It took me nearly 10 years to do this!  My soft and lovely Epimediums never stab me... well, ok, I stretch the truth a bit, a few have spiny leaves, not pokey when green but upon drying they are sharp indeed.  But that is *my* exception to my own rule, thus it is ok.

And last, I want to explore the identity of certain plants.  Example, some plants like Allium cernuum are infinitely variable.  So I grow dozens upon dozens of dozens of forms, all just Allium cernuum, but all with such variability and individual character, that even after decades of growing them, I feel that I'm still getting to know them.  This is the highly personal side of gardening... but I'm finally starting to get a handle on my compulsive plant obsessions, and focus in on the plants I really want to grow, and just say NO to those that I don't.  However, at all times, there still lurks the inquisitive compulsive gardener, and if I see a new plant I must have, I will have it.  So, if a tractable form of Monardella macrantha appears (hint hint PK), then I'll want it and will seek it out.
« Last Edit: July 10, 2010, 10:39:15 PM by McDonough » Logged

Mark McDonough
Massachusetts, USA, near the New Hampshire border USDA Zone 5
antennaria at charter.net
http://www.plantbuzz.com
Lori S.
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2690



« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2010, 10:29:57 PM »

Hmm, while it has occasionally been suggested that I may be a bit unusually obsessed with variety in plants, I can see now that I am actually quite the model of restraint.   Wink
Logged

Lori
Calgary, Alberta, Canada - Zone 3
-30 C to +30 C (rarely!); elevation ~1130m; annual precipitation ~40 cm
Hoy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3522


..Always Look on the Bright Side of Life...


« Reply #18 on: July 11, 2010, 03:36:45 AM »

My problems the last years are not too many plants - some die and give way for new ones and it is still "uncultivated" land on my property - but those I have are growing too big! My fancy the first years was conifers (not the dwarf ones) and they tend to grow and grow and grow both in height and width. The sun disappeared and so did the view of the fjord. Now I use the chainsaw every winter and have had enough wood for the fireplace in all years since we mowed in.

Later I dreamed of collecting all available Rhododendrons. It took some years before I realized the impossibility in that task. Now I collect all kinds of plants I think can thrive at home or at the two other places we have (in the mountains and at the coast).

Bad winters, dry summers, slugs and so on always open new possibilities!
Logged

Trond
Rogaland, Norway - with cool, often rainy summers  (29C max) and mild, often rainy winters (180 cm/year)!
Pages:  1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.13 :: SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Absado by Fakdordes.